Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Advertise Search Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 305
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

 Table of Contents  
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 2  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 1-2

Improving neonatal survival in India

Department of Neonatology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Pondicherry, India

Date of Web Publication23-Jun-2015

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Ballambattu Vishnu Bhat
Department of Neonatology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Pondicherry - 605 006
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/2349-4220.159111

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Bhat BV, Adhisivam B. Improving neonatal survival in India. Int J Adv Med Health Res 2015;2:1-2

How to cite this URL:
Bhat BV, Adhisivam B. Improving neonatal survival in India. Int J Adv Med Health Res [serial online] 2015 [cited 2023 Feb 4];2:1-2. Available from: https://www.ijamhrjournal.org/text.asp?2015/2/1/1/159111

Every year an estimated four million babies die in the first 4 weeks of life and 75% of neonatal deaths occur in the first week. [1] More than a quarter of global neonatal deaths occur in India. [2] India has achieved significant reduction in the infant mortality rate from 81 deaths per 1,000 live births in 1990 to 47 deaths per 1,000 live births in 2011. However, there is small or no decline in the neonatal mortality rate (NMR), which is still as high as 29 per 1,000 live births. [3],[4] This stagnation of neonatal mortality in India highlights the importance of improving the quality of perinatal as well as neonatal care. It is very obvious that the Millennium Development Goal 4, which stipulates a two-third reduction in under-five mortality by 2015, cannot be achieved without ensuring a substantial reduction in the NMR.

The NMR is not uniform across India. While Kerala and Tamil Nadu have low NMRs (less than 20 per 1,000 live births), Odisha, Madhya Pradesh, and Uttar Pradesh have very high NMRs (37 or more per 1,000 live births). Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Bihar, and Rajasthan alone contribute to 55% of total neonatal deaths in India. [2] The model of Tamil Nadu's health care system and its impact on NMR are worth examining. In this state, a skilled birth attendant attends 90% of deliveries, with almost 25% of deliveries taking place in the primary health care facilities, and 81% of the infants being fully immunized. Increased institutional deliveries, enhanced maternal and neonatal transport system, 24/7 delivery service at primary health centers (PHCs), better utilization of the Accredited Social Health Activist (ASHA) workers, implementation of cash incentive schemes, improved human resource management, and monthly auditing of maternal and infant deaths are important National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) strategies, which have made a significant dent in the NMR of Tamil Nadu. [5]

Prematurity, sepsis, and perinatal asphyxia are the important causes of neonatal mortality in our country. [6],[7] Treatment strategies like antenatal steroids, surfactant administration, oxygen administration by continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), surfactant therapy, innovative methods like the intubation-surfactant-extubation (INSURE) technique, newer modes of ventilation, stringent aseptic measures, and improved control of nosocomial sepsis have contributed to significantly improved survival among preterm babies. [8] The survival of most of the neonates in the community does not require expensive technology or manpower. Ensuring essential newborn care is the cornerstone for decreasing neonatal mortality in India. Appropriate neonatal resuscitation and efforts to make the babies breathe early, exclusive breastfeeding for 6 months, prevention of hypothermia using Kangaroo Mother Care for preterm and low birth weight (LBW) babies, and strategies to prevent sepsis including strict hand hygiene are low cost but effective tools in this context. All health care personnel and caregivers should be trained in essential newborn care.

Preterm and LBW neonates should be given special attention as they form a more vulnerable subgroup. In India, almost eight million LBW infants are born each year that accounts for nearly 40% of the global burden, the highest for any country. [9] Late preterm neonates also have significantly higher mortality and morbidity compared to term controls. Maternal hypertension and lower gestational age are strong predictors of their morbidity. [10] Though neonatal transport is an important determinant of clinical outcome among sick neonates, it is often neglected in resource-restricted settings such as India. Stabilization, prior to transport, is essential and the principles of neonatal transportation are independent of distance. Hypothermia and hypoglycemia should be prevented in neonates during transport as they adversely affect the outcome. [11]

To improve neonatal survival, community-based interventions comprising delivery of packages through home visits and community mobilization should expand. Simultaneously, facility-based newborn care (FBNC) should be strengthened. A nationwide creation of Newborn Care Corners (NBCC) at every point of child birth, new born stabilization units (NBSUs) at community health centers, and special newborn care units (SNCUs) at district hospitals have given a thrust to neonatal care in India. Guidelines and toolkits for standardized infrastructure, human resources, and services at each level have been developed and a system of reporting data on the facility-based newborn care (FBNC) created. Over half a million neonates are being treated each year at SNCUs alone and the number is rising. [2]

The national neonatology forum (NNF) neonatal week theme for 2013 was "Quality issues and Accreditation in Neonatal Health care delivery system." Accreditation provides a visible commitment by an organization to improve the quality of patient care and/or services, ensure a safe environment, and continually work to reduce risks to both the patients and the staff. It is obviously not a one time process but should be ongoing and continuous. The basic objective of neonatal care accreditation is about improving the way in which care is delivered to neonates and the quality of care they receive. It is the right strategy to audit individual neonatal units to analyze whether the place, personnel, equipment, and protocols are in place, and whether they are maintained as per the specified national/international standards.

The Every Newborn Action Plan (ENAP), which has been recently endorsed by the World Health Assembly, calls for an NMR of less than 10 per 1,000 live births by 2035 in all countries. Following this, the India Newborn Action Plan (INAP) was recently launched by the Government of India with the following key recommendations:

  1. Ensure that every mother-baby dyad receives quality care during labor, delivery, and thereafter,
  2. Ensure increased coverage of home-based newborn care (HBNC) and of treatment for neonatal sickness,
  3. Apply best practices of care at SNCUs on a nationwide level, create mentoring teams, and further increase such units to address the unmet needs,
  4. Address key social determinants of neonatal health, childbirth after 20 years, and birth spacing,
  5. Focus on reducing the inequities in maternal-neonatal care,
  6. Strengthen techno-managerial capacity of the program teams,
  7. Nurture the neonatal equipment industry,
  8. Harness the potential of IT in neonatal health education, service delivery, and behavior change,
  9. Revamp the monitoring of vital neonatal-perinatal data and coverage indicators, and
  10. Develop a roadmap to end all the preventable neonatal deaths and stillbirths. [2]

If all these key recommendations are put to practice, neonatal survival is sure to improve in our country.

  References Top

Lawn JE, Cousens S, Zupan J; Lancet Neonatal Survival Steering Team. 4 million neonatal deaths: When? Where? Why? Lancet 2005;365:891-900.  Back to cited text no. 1
Public Health Foundation of India. State of India′s newborns 2014. Available from: http://www.phfi.org/images/pdf/soin_report.pdf. [Last accessed on 2015 Jan 31].  Back to cited text no. 2
UNICEF, WHO, The World Bank, and United Nations. Levels and Trends in Child Mortality. Report 2013 - Estimates Developed by the UN Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation. New York: WHO; 2013. p. 1.  Back to cited text no. 3
Registrar General of India. Sample Registration System Statistical Report 2012. New Delhi: Government of India 2013. p.79.  Back to cited text no. 4
Kumutha J, Chitra N, Vidyasagar D. Impact of implementation of NRHM program on NMR in Tamil Nadu (TN): A case study. Indian J Pediatr 2014;81:1358-66.  Back to cited text no. 5
Liu L, Johnson HL, Cousens S, Perin J, Scott S, Lawn JE, et al.; Child Health Epidemiology Reference Group of WHO and UNICEF. Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality: An updated systematic analysis for 2010 with time trends since 2000. Lancet 2012;379:2151-61.  Back to cited text no. 6
Bassani DG, Kumar R, Awasthi S, Morris SK, Paul VK, Shet A, et al.; Million Death Study Collaborators. Causes of neonatal and child mortality in India: A nationally representative mortality survey. Lancet 2010;376:1853-60.  Back to cited text no. 7
Vidyasagar D, Velaphi S, Bhat VB. Surfactant replacement therapy in developing countries. Neonatology 2011;99:355-66.  Back to cited text no. 8
Bhat BV, Adhisivam B. Trends and outcome of low birth weight (LBW) infants in India. Indian J Pediatr 2013;80:60-2.  Back to cited text no. 9
Femitha P, Bhat BV. Early neonatal outcome in late preterms. Indian J Pediatr 2012;79:1019-24.  Back to cited text no. 10
Rathod D, Adhisivam B, Bhat BV. Transport of sick neonates to a tertiary care hospital, south India: Condition at arrival and outcome. Trop Doct 2015;45:96-9.  Back to cited text no. 11

This article has been cited by
1 ELBW and ELGAN outcomes in developing nations–Systematic review and meta-analysis
Viraraghavan Vadakkencherry Ramaswamy,Thangaraj Abiramalatha,Tapas Bandyopadhyay,Nasreen Banu Shaik,Prathik Bandiya,Debasish Nanda,Abdul Kareem Pullattayil S.,Srinivas Murki,Charles Christoph Roehr,Harald Ehrhardt
PLOS ONE. 2021; 16(8): e0255352
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 A review of privacy and usability issues in mobile health systems: Role of external factors
Jane Katusiime,Niels Pinkwart
Health Informatics Journal. 2019; 25(3): 935
[Pubmed] | [DOI]


Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

  In this article

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded410    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 2    

Recommend this journal